Showing posts with label Queensland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Queensland. Show all posts

Sunday, October 2, 2022

A Kindness Cup by Thea Astley

What is the point, any point, in a return?

My filled days, he thinks ironically, my filled days. With walks along the front, a shambles to the pier and along it to the point where winds knot green swirl of sea and gull and fish and some crumbling other man casting his lines. Back to the figged park and the bottle-lollied picnic kiosk, and an hour or so beneath broad leaves pecking at book or paper. Barney Sweetman. The bastard, he says. And Buckmaster. Buckmaster and Sweetman. Knighted for milking God's earth. Knighted for handling the sugar strikes. Knighted for owning more acres of sweet grass in the north than any man had right to control. But not knighted for that noon at Mandarana--how the names come back now!--the virtue guards with rifles kicking their unwilling horses up the runty slopes while the natives scuttled like roos from bush to bush until the high plateau. Or after. The down-curve through hot air and the body whizzing.

Former schoolmaster Tom Dorahy is returning to The Taws, the town in Queensland, Australia he left twenty years ago. Dorahy left town because of an act of terrible violence: a vigilante group slaughtered six Aborigines they suspected of pilfering from their farms. A seventh, cornered by the men, threw herself from a cliffside, clutching her baby, who, unlike the mother, miraculously survived the fall. A sick old man was gunned down at the home of a white farmer trying to protect him; the farmer is tied to the dead body for a week, and loses a leg from a gangrenous infection. The men who committed acts never faced justice; in fact, they've prospered, becoming knights and elected officials. But Dorahy is intent on using the town's homecoming to expose them at last.

A Kindness Cup is a novel about colonial violence and willful ignorance. Everywhere Dorahy goes, irritated locals ask him, why not let it go? It was so long ago. But of course, this is how colonial violence works; if you escape justice in the aftermath--and of course you do--time springs up to indemnify you, and the murdered natives, those still suffering from expulsion and grief, are relegated behind the barriers of history. Dorahy has no strategy, as with the trial many years ago, whose scenes pepper the novel, he can't keep himself from exclaiming the truth. In this way he acts as a kind of guilty conscience, the heart battering from beneath the floorboards. Dorahy's forthrightness gathers allies, all mostly unwilling, like a local news editor. On the other hand, those who committed violence in the past prove all too willing to commit violence in order to keep the story from coming to light.

Astley is a strange writer. I don't know that I was prepared for The Acolyte, which I read last year. Her style is very elliptical, and her writing at times has that quality (which she shares with my Australian fave Patrick White) where you're not sure whether it's amazing prose or terrible prose. Maybe I just knew what I was getting into, but I thought that The Kindness Cup was a better use of that strangeness. The scenes of violence stand out vividly, though I felt at times that they overshadowed the "story proper" of Dorahy's return. And I wonder if it might have made better use of the victimized Aborigines, who are largely mute. (There's something unintentional about the way that Konawha, the suicide, is placed beyond the narrative by her death, while the white farmer Lunt remains to suffer for our sympathy.) Still, A Kindness Cup does with a cutting sharpness what it sets out to do: slice through the myths of Australian pioneerdom to show how, like all settler colonial myths, they are predicated on murder and enforced silence.

Sunday, April 25, 2021

The Acolyte by Thea Astley

Sometimes I have thought in azurous moments of divination that perhaps I am Holberg's other self, his seeing self, and while I store up, programming into my giant Cyclops eye like a slave computer, he expends all his heart-pulse on interpretation. It could explain my bondage, which has all the transparency of cellophane but is a thousand times tougher.

Jack Holberg is a musical genius. Blind since shortly after his birth--he lost the use of his eyes thanks to the neglect of his parents, who allowed them to be infected by blowflies--he has become a famous pianist and composer. His works draw from classical sources as well as blues, rock-and-roll, barroom music, and like any good rock and roller, he has an entourage whose life is deeply entangled with his. Paul Vesper, the novel's narrator, leaves his middle-class engineering job to act as a kind of factotum to Holberg. He helps organize Holberg's flights of genius into compositions, but so does he cook dinner, run errands, and maintain the house where Holberg and his other hangers-on live in commune. But the line between admiration and resentment is quite thin, and Paul is tortured by his position:

Don't, listen, don't for one eyeball-searing second imagine this is going to be an analysis of the artist in angst. We're the ones--Bonnie, Faith, Vesper, Ilse, Hilda--who are the interesting cases, the fringe-dwellers in the suburbs of the great man's genius--any great man. Holberg is my cross and I'm nailed to him and you wonder why it is I don't wriggle off and walk away? The rips in the soft pads of my pander hands, perhaps. The rags of feet. I'm the mini-Jesus!

Holberg, it is true, can be quite cruel. As soon as Paul falls in love with Hilda, Holberg snatches her away from him, leaving him with his former lover (and Hilda's sister) Ilse. When Hilda is tortured by Holberg's infidelities, Holberg tosses her to Paul to mollify her in the bedroom. Holberg reveals to Ilse's husband that he, Holberg, is the true father of the man's child, leading the man to despair and suicide. People in Holberg's orbit have a way of getting hurt and dying, as if thrown into chaos by Holberg's own tempestuous moods and thrown against the rocks of his diffidence. And yet, like Paul, none of them can ever just get up and leave.

Blindness is a torture to Holberg, who is obsessed with his own inability to understand what people mean when they talk about colors. And yet blindness is the very thing that makes Holberg the musical genius he is, the thing that provides him with his compensatory talents. Then again it is blindness, too, Paul explains, that makes him cruel. Unable as he is to see the faces of the people around him, he cannot see the way they are tortured or distraught. Or perhaps being unable to see them affords a plausible deniability about such things: Paul, who knows Holberg better than anyone, begins to pick up that the composer's music is inscribed with secret messages that mock his entourage's despair and desperation. He seems not to notice, for example, that Hilda has taken to stumbling around the house with her eyes closed in order to understand him better, but his next opus imitates her broken, crashing gait. Paul, who knows Holberg better than anyone, can hear these things when no one else can.

Honestly, I sort of hated the prose style of The Acolyte. The snatches of Greek and Latin, the obscure vocabulary, the densely knotted sentences, they all seem so suffocating and pretentious. I could barely follow it at times. I wonder how much of this is an indication of Astley's style and how much is part of the voice of Paul, who is both suffocated and pretentious. I got pretty bad whiplash going from the repetitive plainness of Gerald Murnane to this prose, which is like being caught in a tangle of vines. Like Paul, at the end of The Acolyte I was rather happy just to get out.